A talk on Bioelectricity with a special slant towards immunology and the concept of hacking

Published by

on

This is a 1-hour talk I gave in November, 2023 on bioelectricity as the cognitive glue of morphological architecture, but it was for a department of microbiology and immunology (and infectious disease), so I also mentioned some issues such as:

  • bioelectrical control of innate and adaptive immune system
  • invasion and parasitism and the need for all agents to know the borders between them and the outside world (and, whether the thoughts/signals/processes going on inside them belong “to them” vs. being imposed by an exploitative agent from the outside – learning v. being trained)
  • more generally the concept of hacking, and the idea that bioengineers aren’t the only ones that hack the competencies of our reprogrammable hardware, but that life is doing this all the time – both vertically (higher levels of organization bending the energy landscape for their parts) and horizontally (cells and tissues hacking each other, and competition among organs in vivo)
  • bioelectricity as a convenient interface for cross-level hacking

Here’s the Q&A after:

Previous Post
Next Post

24 responses to “A talk on Bioelectricity with a special slant towards immunology and the concept of hacking”

  1. Alain Schaerer Avatar
    Alain Schaerer

    You mentioned light as a communication medium. Would you mind elaborating on that?

    Also, have you looked at mechanical interventions as a medium? If imagine that is probably hard to do with animals as you cant tell them to do a certain movement a certain way.

    Thank you for your work, its appreciated. I will be following closely.

    1. Mike Levin Avatar
      Mike Levin

      With respect to light, there is a whole field of research focused on ultraweak photon emission between cells and even between organisms. Started by one of my all-time scientific heroes, Alexander Gurwitsch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Gurwitsch) the field of biophotons research has significantly expanded. It’s pretty clear that living systems communicate via biophotons, but decoding it is still the major open frontier. With respect to mechanical, yes – we’re working on the use of induced mechanical vibrations to communicate with the biomechanical interface of cell collectives, like we have been with the bioelectric (and others have with the biochemical).

      1. Alain Schaerer Avatar
        Alain Schaerer

        Thank you gor that. I will start studying it.

  2. Alain Schaerer Avatar
    Alain Schaerer

    One more question.
    You mentioned that you have to injure the organism before it uses the new electrical pattern. What is the definition of injury here?

    I have found that we can make anatomical changes without having to severly injure somebody like cutting off a limb. Now that I think about it, Id imagine that from mechanical stimuli and training, there will still be microinjuries which would trigger the anatomical change? Not sure.

    1. Mike Levin Avatar
      Mike Levin

      Tissues seem to need to be in active remodeling (i.e., they need to measure a delta between the state they want to be in, and the state they’re in right now) to pay attention to bioelectrical cues (and maybe other kinds too, not sure). That error perception (a.k.a., stress) can be caused by injury but also by many other things, including metamorphosis, embryogenesis, cancer, wound healing, possibly microtrauma, etc. A full understanding of when tissues do and don’t consult their pattern memories is a very active line of work, but many unknowns.

      1. Alain Schaerer Avatar
        Alain Schaerer

        Got it! Thanks for your work again.

      2. Matt Avatar
        Matt

        Planaria and amphibians you work with(?) do have by default this ability to trigger regeneration when injured. Is this a difficulty to port this work to mammals or do they switch to “active remodelling” in the same way (in which case why don’t the tissue regenerate, is it because they have difficulty accessing the pattern memory or do cells feel like they don’t have to do anything about that delta?)

  3. Mirka Avatar
    Mirka

    How do you “read” what should be done with a particular type of tumor (type of cancer cells). Or is it different for every individual case of cancer?

    How difficult is to bring this approach into clinical practice/using electroceuticals on humans? Do you think AI can speed this process up? Thank you, your work is just “WOW” 🙂

    1. Mike Levin Avatar
      Mike Levin

      Excellent question. We are not sure yet whether different types of states will have to be imposed on different types of tumor cells. My guess right now is that we won’t have to micromanage it – the idea is to have the other cells tell them what to do, which means, we need to electrically reconnect them to the cellular network and they become part of the collective that is following a large goal (organ generation and upkeep). I suspect this will be a general type of approach. As for clinical practice, we’re moving in that direction now. We’ve already done some of this with human glioblastoma and breast cancer (see some papers at https://drmichaellevin.org/publications/cancer.html and a talk that mentions this at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5VI0u5_12k ). I do think AI will speed this process up, by letting us process the signals from cells and decode what the collective is thinking under normal and cancerous (and pre-cancerous) conditions.

      1. Bob Averill Avatar

        Do you feel that the data point to the bioelectric field observing itself (self-reflective emergent property) or something else observing the bioelectric field (perhaps another quantum energy field hidden in the dark energy/matter perhaps which embues all conscious entities with the observational power of subjective awareness)?

        1. Mike Levin Avatar
          Mike Levin

          I do think the bioelectric network observes itself. I don’t have any data for (or expertise in) quantum energy fields or dark energy/matter so I couldn’t say anything about those.

      2. Mirka Avatar
        Mirka

        Thanks! I see. So the signal for the tumor is more like “you are not separate, you are part of .. this tissue, behave accordingly ..”.

        .. reminds me a little bit of the descriptions of nondual psychical state (overcoming separation, enlightenment). Like, could it be also induced by ion channels in brain. Sorry if the association is too crazy 🙂

  4. Stoyan Avatar
    Stoyan

    In a different level of abstraction, we are as concsious as our receptors allow us to be. The observing seems to be important for computationally bound beings as us. Do You think that the work of Stephen Wolfram (Physics project) can be helpful in Your field?

    1. Mike Levin Avatar
      Mike Levin

      The observing is key (https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/8/1/110/htm and two of my favorite thinkers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mitw2XcXY98). I don’t know enough about the recent Wolfram work to say, but look forward to digging into it eventually.

  5. Tigran Bleyan Avatar
    Tigran Bleyan

    What are the impacts you think of this bioelectrical effect on development on bacteria and fungi? Is there not enough of a possibility space for single celled bacteria?

    Thank you Dr. Levin for sharing your work and time! You take on a lot to repeat your findings to new listeners. I’ve read Bioelectricity’s articles on Microbial Electrophysiology and wonder what we can change for bacteria and with what stimulus.

    Continue the great work!

    1. Mike Levin Avatar
      Mike Levin

      Thanks. Fungi: look at the work of Neil Gow such as https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03746609508684833 ; bacteria, some amazing recent work by https://suellab.github.io/ and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21764748 .

      1. Tigran Bleyan Avatar
        Tigran Bleyan

        I’ve got plenty to look into! Thank you once again.

        Sharing this with peers. How best can we support you?

  6. wayne Lewis Avatar
    wayne Lewis

    Well Mike, on the one hand your argument that there is a continuous process from fertilized oocyte to organism with no lighting bolt is very well taken. On the other Rosen argument that life/mind are different in kind looks pretty rigorous as he developed it. For me the resolution has to be some form of panexperientialism…it has to be agency and experience all the way down.

  7. wayne Lewis Avatar
    wayne Lewis

    Indeed, the hardware in biology is quite good enough and I conjecture it is universal in terms of problems solving in any space whatsoever. Perhaps it’s time to leave the hardware alone and concentrate exclusively on software.

  8. wayne Lewis Avatar
    wayne Lewis

    …btw, with respect to the combination problem that arises in panexperientialism, I conjecture this is fundamentally a software question.

  9. wayne Lewis Avatar
    wayne Lewis

    Question: with to cancer. The approach your on now is great for early detection and reversion to well behaved cells is already amazing. Do you have any thoughts on how we might address metastatic cancer at the software level. Nothing immediately suggests itself to me.

  10. wayne Lewis Avatar
    wayne Lewis

    One wild idea, may not be possible, but how about smart machines that can recognize cancer cells and inject ion Chanel drugs or rna to revert these cells wherever they may be to electrical connectivity?

  11. wayne Lewis Avatar
    wayne Lewis

    One more question; in planaria it’s clear how wild type set points can be heritatable. But in organisms that develop from fertized embryos it must be somehow inherited via the ovum?

    1. Mike Levin Avatar
      Mike Levin

      Yes. We do not yet know if this information is passed on during normal sexual reproduction (but we have some tantalizing clues that body bioelectrics can impact the cytoplasm and other epigenetic factors in the germline so it’s not impossible that some of it can pass on; see also the awesome work on transgenerational inheritance by Oded Rechavi).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: